Improving Species Level-taxonomic Assignment from 16S rRNA Sequencing Technologies.

Analysis of the bacterial community from a 16S rRNA gene sequencing technologies requires comparing the reads to a reference database. The challenging task involved in annotation relies on the currently available tools and 16S rRNA databases: SILVA, Greengenes and RDP. A successful annotation depends on the quality of the database. For instance, Greengenes and RDP have not been updated since 2013 and 2016, respectively. In addition, the nature of 16S sequencing technologies (short reads) focuses mainly on the V3-V4 hypervariable region sequencing and hinders the species assignment, in contrast to whole shotgun metagenome sequencing. Here, we combine the results of three standard protocols for 16S rRNA amplicon annotation that utilize homology-based methods, and we propose a new re-annotation strategy to enlarge the percentage of amplicon sequence variants (ASV) classified up to the species level. Following the pattern (reference) method: DADA2 pipeline and SILVA v.138.1 reference database classification (Basic Protocol 1), our method maps the ASV sequences to custom nucleotide BLAST with the SILVA v.138.1 (Basic Protocol 2), and to the 16S database of Bacteria and Archaea of NCBI RefSeq Targeted Loci Project databases (Basic Protocol 3). This new re-annotation workflow was tested in 16S rRNA amplicon data from 156 human fecal samples. The proposed new strategy achieved an increase of nearly eight times the proportion of ASV classified at the species level in contrast to the reference method for the database used in the present research. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Sample inference and taxonomic profiling through DADA2 algorithm. Basic Protocol 2: Custom BLASTN database creation and ASV taxonomical assignment. Basic Protocol 3: ASV taxonomical assignment using NCBI RefSeq Targeted Loci Project database. Basic Protocol 4: Definitive selection of lineages among the three methods.

Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) has rapidly been adopted as the standard third-line therapy to treat aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCL) after failure of second-line therapy despite the lack of direct comparisons with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)-based strategies. Using the Grupo Español de Trasplante y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) registry, we selected patients with the following characteristics: CART or alloHCT performed between 2016 and 2021; ≥18 years old; ABCL diagnosis; ≥2 lines of therapy; and either anti-CD19 CART or alloHCT as therapy at relapse. The analysis included a total of 316 (CART = 215, alloHCT = 101) patients. Median follow-up was 15 and 36 months for the CART and alloHCT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CART was confirmed to be similar to alloHCT for the primary study endpoint (progression-free survival) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, CI95%:0.56-1.51, p = 0.75). Furthermore, when the analysis was limited to only patients with chemo-sensitive diseases (complete and partial response) at infusion (CART = 26, alloHCT=93), no differences were reported (progression-free survival at month +18: 65% versus 55%, p = 0.59). However, CART had lower non-relapse mortality (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.85, p = 0.02). Given the lower toxicity and similar survival outcomes, these results suggest the use of CART before alloHCT.